scot: queen of was danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.48
, species
Weight: 0.47
, english
Weight: 0.45
Siblings adam smith
Weight: 0.59
, james watt
Weight: 0.55
, cunt
Weight: 0.32
, fart
Weight: 0.32
, git
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
queen of was danger 1.00
queen of was threat 0.93
queen of was threat to elizabeth 0.87
queen of was queen 0.86
queen of was menace 0.84
queen of was enemy 0.82
queen of was menace elizabeth 0.82
queen of was menace to elizabeth 0.82
queen of was prison 0.80
queen of was first marriage 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was danger)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was queen)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was queen)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was queen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was queen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was threat to elizabeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was menace elizabeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was threat to elizabeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was threat to elizabeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was menace elizabeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was menace elizabeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was menace to elizabeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was threat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was menace to elizabeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was menace to elizabeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was threat to elizabeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was menace elizabeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was threat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was enemy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was enemy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was enemy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was menace to elizabeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was threat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was enemy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was threat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was menace)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was first marriage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was prison)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was menace)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was menace)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was menace)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was first marriage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(scot, queen of was prison)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was prison)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was prison)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(scot, queen of was first marriage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was first marriage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(scot, queen of was danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(scot, queen of was danger)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(scot, queen of was danger)