screen: freeze

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents display
Weight: 0.62
, graphic
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table
Weight: 0.62
, monitor
Weight: 0.60
, retina
Weight: 0.54
, touchpad
Weight: 0.52
, blowjob
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
freeze 1.00
freeze in refrigerator 0.87
enlarge to freeze 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(item, freeze in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(screen, freeze)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(item, freeze in refrigerator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(item, freeze in refrigerator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(item, freeze in refrigerator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(screen, freeze)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(screen, freeze)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(screen, enlarge to freeze)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(screen, enlarge to freeze)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(screen, enlarge to freeze)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(screen, enlarge to freeze)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(screen, freeze)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(screen, freeze)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(item, freeze in refrigerator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(screen, freeze) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(item, freeze in refrigerator)