screen: has quality print

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents display
Weight: 0.62
, graphic
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table
Weight: 0.62
, monitor
Weight: 0.60
, retina
Weight: 0.54
, touchpad
Weight: 0.52
, blowjob
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality print 1.00
print good 0.94
print vital 0.87
printing 0.81
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(monitor, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(table, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(table, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(table, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(monitor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(monitor, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(screen, has quality print)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(screen, print good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(screen, print good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(screen, print good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(screen, print vital)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(screen, print vital)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(screen, print vital)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(screen, printing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(screen, printing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(screen, printing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(screen, print good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, print vital)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(screen, printing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(screen, has quality print)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(screen, has quality print)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(table, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(screen, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monitor, has quality good)