scuba diving: be in bonaire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents swimming pool
Weight: 0.69
, water sport
Weight: 0.69
, sport
Weight: 0.68
, fun
Weight: 0.66
Siblings swimming
Weight: 0.37
, boating
Weight: 0.37
, skydiving
Weight: 0.36
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in bonaire 1.00
have clorine 0.77
be in different 0.76
be important at work 0.76
being bronies 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fun, being bronies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(scuba diving, be in bonaire)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(swimming pool, have clorine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(scuba diving, be in bonaire)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fun, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(scuba diving, be in bonaire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fun, be important at work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, have clorine)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fun, being bronies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fun, be important at work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, have clorine)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fun, being bronies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(swimming pool, have clorine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, be in bonaire)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fun, being bronies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, be in bonaire)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fun, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(scuba diving, be in bonaire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(scuba diving, be in bonaire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(scuba diving, be in bonaire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fun, be important at work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(swimming pool, have clorine)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fun, being bronies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fun, be important at work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(swimming pool, have clorine)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(scuba diving, be in bonaire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fun, being bronies)