sculpture: be made of metal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artwork
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.60
, medium
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, accessory
Weight: 0.58
Siblings acrylic
Weight: 0.51
, collage
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.34
, vase
Weight: 0.34
, tapestry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of metal 1.00
be made of plastic 0.84
be made of wood 0.81
be plastic 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be plastic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(acrylic, be plastic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(sculpture, be made of metal)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(sculpture, be made of plastic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sculpture, be made of plastic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sculpture, be made of plastic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sculpture, be made of wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sculpture, be made of wood)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sculpture, be made of wood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sculpture, be made of wood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sculpture, be made of plastic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sculpture, be made of metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sculpture, be made of metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sculpture, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(acrylic, be plastic)