sea otter: be important to ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.76
, pacific ocean
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.74
, creature
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings puffin
Weight: 0.52
, otter
Weight: 0.40
, sea lion
Weight: 0.40
, whale
Weight: 0.39
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to ecosystem 1.00
be important to karana 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, be important to ecosystem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sea lion, be important to ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sea lion, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(sea lion, be important to ecosystem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(humpback whale, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, be important to ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(sea otter, be important to karana)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be important to karana)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sea otter, be important to karana)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sea otter, be important to karana)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sea lion, be important to ecosystem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(humpback whale, be important to ecosystem)