seafood: go quickly bad

Related concepts

Parents	food Weight: 0.68 , fresh food Weight: 0.65 , ingredient Weight: 0.64 , meat Weight: 0.62 , kitchen Weight: 0.60
Siblings	eel Weight: 0.65 , shellfish Weight: 0.37 , pet food Weight: 0.37 , tuna Weight: 0.37 , lunch meat Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
go quickly bad	1.00
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(seafood, go quickly bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(meat, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(seafood, go quickly bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(meat, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(shellfish, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(shellfish, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(seafood, go quickly bad)

Similarity expansion

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(seafood, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(seafood, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(seafood, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(seafood, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Salient(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(seafood, go quickly bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(seafood, go quickly bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)