seafood: smell

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.68
, fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eel
Weight: 0.65
, shellfish
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.37
, tuna
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
smell 1.00
have signature smell 0.84
stink 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tuna, smell)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tuna, stink)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tuna, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tuna, smell)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tuna, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tuna, stink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(seafood, smell)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(seafood, stink)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(seafood, stink)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(seafood, stink)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(seafood, stink)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(seafood, have signature smell)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seafood, smell)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(seafood, smell)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tuna, smell)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seafood, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tuna, stink)