seahorse: be considered fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, sea
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.48
Siblings sea otter
Weight: 0.37
, whale shark
Weight: 0.37
, dolphin
Weight: 0.37
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.37
, cassowary
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered fish 1.00
is fish 0.95
be different from fish 0.90
is unusual fish 0.85
is fishes 0.82
be called seahorses 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sea, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seahorse, be considered fish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sea, is fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sea, is fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, is fish)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is fish)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sea, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(seahorse, be considered fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(whale shark, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is fish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dolphin, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(dolphin, is fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(seahorse, be considered fish)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(seahorse, is fish)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(seahorse, is fish)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(seahorse, is fish)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(seahorse, be different from fish)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(seahorse, be different from fish)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be considered fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seahorse, be considered fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sea, is fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(whale shark, is fish)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dolphin, is fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(seahorse, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sea, is fish)