search: be in messages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents search engine
Weight: 0.74
, operation
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wildcard
Weight: 0.46
, urinalysis
Weight: 0.43
, database
Weight: 0.33
, raid
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in messages 1.00
be in messages bad 0.96
is email 0.76
is email address 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wildcard, is email)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wildcard, is email address)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wildcard, is email) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(wildcard, is email)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wildcard, is email address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(wildcard, is email address)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(search, be in messages)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(search, be in messages bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(search, be in messages bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(search, be in messages bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(search, be in messages bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(search, be in messages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(search, be in messages)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(wildcard, is email)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(search, be in messages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(wildcard, is email address)