searcher: be considered great movie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.54
, western
Weight: 0.49
, user
Weight: 0.43
, researcher
Weight: 0.41
, officer
Weight: 0.39
Siblings spider man
Weight: 0.30
, avatar
Weight: 0.30
, heaven
Weight: 0.30
, computer user
Weight: 0.30
, horror movie
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered great movie 1.00
be considered movie 0.93
is great 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heaven, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heaven, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(heaven, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(searcher, be considered great movie)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(searcher, be considered movie)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(searcher, be considered movie)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(searcher, be considered movie)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(searcher, be considered movie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(searcher, is great)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(searcher, is great)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(searcher, is great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(searcher, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(searcher, be considered great movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(searcher, be considered great movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(searcher, be considered great movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heaven, is great)