seating: is plan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, event
Weight: 0.53
, accommodation
Weight: 0.52
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.69
, toilet seat
Weight: 0.33
, theater ticket
Weight: 0.33
, seat
Weight: 0.33
, air ticket
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is plan 1.00
plan career 0.81
plan good career 0.80
plan stressful 0.78
be planned 0.77
planning 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(event, plan good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seating, is plan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(event, plan stressful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seating, is plan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(feature, be planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seating, is plan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(event, planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seating, is plan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(event, planning)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(feature, be planned)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(event, plan stressful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(event, plan good career)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(event, plan good career)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(event, plan stressful)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(feature, be planned)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(event, planning)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(event, plan good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seating, is plan)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(event, plan stressful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seating, is plan)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(feature, be planned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seating, is plan)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(event, planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seating, is plan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(seating, is plan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seating, is plan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(event, planning)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(feature, be planned)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(event, plan stressful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(event, plan good career)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(event, planning)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(feature, be planned)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(event, plan stressful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(seating, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(event, plan good career)