seattle: has color white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, san francisco
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, port
Weight: 0.59
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, san diego
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.36
, chicago
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color white 1.00
has color yellow 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(port, has color white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(seattle, has color white)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(san francisco, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(seattle, has color white)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(los angeles, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(seattle, has color white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(los angeles, has color yellow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(port, has color white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(san francisco, has color yellow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(port, has color white)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, has color yellow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, has color yellow)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chicago, has color yellow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(san diego, has color yellow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has color yellow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(port, has color white)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(seattle, has color white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(san francisco, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(seattle, has color white)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(los angeles, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(seattle, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(san jose, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(san jose, has color yellow)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(las vegas, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(las vegas, has color yellow)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(san diego, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(san diego, has color yellow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chicago, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chicago, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(seattle, has color white)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seattle, has color yellow)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(seattle, has color yellow)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(seattle, has color yellow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color yellow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(seattle, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(los angeles, has color yellow)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(san francisco, has color yellow)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(port, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(san jose, has color yellow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(san diego, has color yellow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(las vegas, has color yellow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chicago, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(port, has color white)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(los angeles, has color yellow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(seattle, has color white)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(san francisco, has color yellow)