seattle: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, san francisco
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, port
Weight: 0.59
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, san diego
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.36
, chicago
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(new york, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(seattle, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(san francisco, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(seattle, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(los angeles, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(seattle, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(new york, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(new york, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(new york, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seattle, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(san francisco, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seattle, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(los angeles, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seattle, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(san jose, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(san jose, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(san diego, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(san diego, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(new york city, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(new york city, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(seattle, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(seattle, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san francisco, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new york, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san jose, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(las vegas, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(san diego, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new york city, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(san francisco, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(seattle, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(new york, is expensive)