secondary: has manner response

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.50
, player
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings linebacker
Weight: 0.30
, football player
Weight: 0.30
, quarterback
Weight: 0.30
, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Weight: 0.30
, dvd player
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has manner response 1.00
is response more rapid 0.83
is response rapid 0.82
be quicker response 0.82
be stronger response 0.79
is immune response more rapid 0.79
is immune response 0.78
is immune response rapid 0.77
be quicker immune response 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(secondary, has manner response)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(secondary, is response more rapid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(secondary, is response rapid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(secondary, be stronger response)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(secondary, be quicker response)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(secondary, be quicker immune response)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(secondary, is immune response more rapid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(secondary, is immune response rapid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(secondary, is immune response)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(secondary, be quicker response)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(secondary, be quicker immune response)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(secondary, is response more rapid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(secondary, is response rapid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(secondary, be stronger response)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(secondary, be quicker response)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(secondary, is immune response more rapid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(secondary, is immune response)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(secondary, is immune response rapid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(secondary, be quicker response)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(secondary, is response rapid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(secondary, be quicker immune response)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(secondary, is immune response)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(secondary, be stronger response)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(secondary, is response more rapid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(secondary, is immune response more rapid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(secondary, is immune response)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(secondary, is immune response rapid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(secondary, is response rapid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(secondary, is immune response more rapid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(secondary, be quicker immune response)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(secondary, is immune response rapid)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(secondary, be stronger response)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(secondary, is response more rapid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(secondary, has manner response)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(secondary, has manner response)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(secondary, has manner response)