secretary: be used to answer phone

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents director
Weight: 0.67
, assistant
Weight: 0.66
, office worker
Weight: 0.65
, worker
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chairman
Weight: 0.36
, chief
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, executive
Weight: 0.35
, minister
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to answer phone 1.00
answer phone 1.00
answer telephone 0.96
page on phone 0.80
be used to get religious answer 0.78
answer to his boss 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, answer to his boss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(secretary, be used to answer phone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(worker, answer to his boss)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, answer to his boss)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(minister, be used to get religious answer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, answer to his boss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(secretary, be used to answer phone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(minister, be used to get religious answer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(minister, be used to get religious answer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(secretary, be used to answer phone)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(secretary, answer phone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(secretary, answer telephone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(secretary, answer telephone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(secretary, answer phone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(secretary, answer phone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(secretary, answer phone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(secretary, answer telephone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(secretary, page on phone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(secretary, page on phone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(secretary, page on phone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(secretary, page on phone)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(secretary, answer telephone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(secretary, be used to answer phone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(worker, answer to his boss)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(minister, be used to get religious answer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(secretary, be used to answer phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(worker, answer to his boss)