seduction: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.52
, nature
Weight: 0.51
, book
Weight: 0.48
, act
Weight: 0.48
, theme
Weight: 0.48
Siblings sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32
, adultery
Weight: 0.32
, romance
Weight: 0.31
, cruelty
Weight: 0.31
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
works for guys 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(romance, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cruelty, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cruelty, work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(romance, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(romance, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(seduction, work)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seduction, works for guys)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(seduction, works for guys)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seduction, works for guys)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(seduction, works for guys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(seduction, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(seduction, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cruelty, work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(seduction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(romance, work)