senator: get paid for life

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents politician
Weight: 0.76
, democrat
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings senate
Weight: 0.69
, governor
Weight: 0.65
, cicero
Weight: 0.51
, congressman
Weight: 0.40
, bill clinton
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid for life 1.00
be paid for life 0.98
receive more 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(congressman, be paid for life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(congressman, get paid for life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(congressman, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(congressman, get paid for life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(congressman, be paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(congressman, be paid for life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(senator, get paid for life)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(senator, be paid for life)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(senator, be paid for life)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(senator, be paid for life)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(senator, be paid for life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(senator, get paid for life)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(senator, get paid for life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(congressman, get paid for life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(senator, get paid for life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(congressman, be paid for life)