sense: be bad compared to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents common sense
Weight: 0.64
, principle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feeling
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sight
Weight: 0.64
, pursuit
Weight: 0.49
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, fairness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad compared to animals 1.00
be bad compared to most animals 0.97
be for animals 0.84
be important to animals 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sense, be bad compared to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sense, be bad compared to most animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sense, be bad compared to most animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sense, be bad compared to most animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sense, be bad compared to most animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sense, be for animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sense, be for animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(sense, be for animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sense, be important to animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sense, be important to animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, be for animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sense, be important to animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sense, be important to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sense, be bad compared to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sense, be bad compared to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sense, be bad compared to animals)