sense: were alike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents common sense
Weight: 0.64
, principle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feeling
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sight
Weight: 0.64
, pursuit
Weight: 0.49
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, fairness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were alike 1.00
be alike 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(common sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(sense, were alike)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(sense, were alike)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(common sense, were alike)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(factor, be alike)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(common sense, were alike)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(factor, be alike)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(common sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sense, were alike)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sense, were alike)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(sense, were alike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sense, were alike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(sense, were alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(common sense, were alike)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(factor, be alike)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(common sense, were alike)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(sense, were alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(factor, be alike)