sensitivity: be important to living things

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, characteristic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings allergy
Weight: 0.56
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, frequency
Weight: 0.34
, density
Weight: 0.34
, accuracy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to living things 1.00
be important to things 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(density, be important to living things)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(density, be important to things)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(density, be important to things)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(density, be important to things)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(density, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(density, be important to living things)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(sensitivity, be important to living things)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sensitivity, be important to things)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(sensitivity, be important to things)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(sensitivity, be important to things)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important to things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important to living things)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sensitivity, be important to living things)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(density, be important to things)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sensitivity, be important to living things)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(density, be important to living things)