:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
is hot |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bahrain, is hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tokyo, is hot)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tokyo, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tokyo, is hot)
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(seoul, is hot)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seoul, is hot)
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(seoul, is hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bahrain, is hot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seoul, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tokyo, is hot)