sergeant: wear campaign hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.68
, supervisor
Weight: 0.62
, officer
Weight: 0.62
, rank
Weight: 0.59
, soldier
Weight: 0.58
Siblings staff sergeant
Weight: 0.75
, warrant officer
Weight: 0.57
, lieutenant
Weight: 0.37
, police
Weight: 0.37
, constable
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear campaign hats 1.00
be called shirts 0.79
wear red sash 0.78
wear sash 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sergeant, wear campaign hats)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sergeant, be called shirts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sergeant, wear sash)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sergeant, wear red sash)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sergeant, be called shirts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sergeant, be called shirts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(sergeant, wear sash)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sergeant, wear sash)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sergeant, wear red sash)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sergeant, wear red sash)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sergeant, be called shirts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sergeant, wear sash)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sergeant, wear red sash)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sergeant, wear campaign hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sergeant, wear campaign hats)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sergeant, wear campaign hats)