server: entitled to tips

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.69
, personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, computer network
Weight: 0.63
, network device
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.62
Siblings file server
Weight: 0.77
, mac
Weight: 0.64
, mainframe
Weight: 0.58
, pc
Weight: 0.58
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
entitled to tips 1.00
get tips 0.90
make tips 0.89
deserve tips 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(server, entitled to tips)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(server, get tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(server, make tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(server, get tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(server, make tips)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(server, deserve tips)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(server, deserve tips)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(server, make tips)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(server, make tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(server, get tips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(server, deserve tips)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(server, get tips)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(server, deserve tips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(server, entitled to tips)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(server, entitled to tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(server, entitled to tips)