service counter: be at store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at store 1.00
be at shop 0.85
be at record store 0.84
be at deli 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(service counter, be at store)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(service counter, be at shop)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(service counter, be at record store)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(service counter, be at deli)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(service counter, be at deli)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(service counter, be at deli)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(service counter, be at record store)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(service counter, be at shop)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(service counter, be at shop)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(service counter, be at record store)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(service counter, be at shop)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(service counter, be at record store)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(service counter, be at deli)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(service counter, be at store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(service counter, be at store)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(service counter, be at store)