service: be central to marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be central to marketing 1.00
is marketing 0.90
be central to operations 0.79
differ from goods marketing 0.76
need branding 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(service, be central to marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(service, be central to operations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(service, differ from goods marketing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(service, need branding)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(service, be central to operations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(service, be central to operations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(service, be central to operations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(service, differ from goods marketing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(service, differ from goods marketing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(service, need branding)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(service, need branding)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(service, differ from goods marketing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(service, need branding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, be central to marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(service, be central to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(service, be central to marketing)