service: relative to major long haul airlines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
relative to major long haul airlines 1.00
relative to other major long haul airlines 1.00
relative to major haul airlines 0.99
relative to other major haul airlines 0.99
relative to other long haul airlines 0.99
relative to long haul airlines 0.99
relative to other haul airlines 0.98
relative to haul airlines 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(service, relative to other major long haul airlines)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(service, relative to major haul airlines)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(service, relative to other major haul airlines)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(service, relative to other long haul airlines)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(service, relative to other major long haul airlines)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(service, relative to long haul airlines)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(service, relative to major haul airlines)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(service, relative to other major haul airlines)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(service, relative to other long haul airlines)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(service, relative to long haul airlines)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(service, relative to other haul airlines)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(service, relative to haul airlines)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(service, relative to other haul airlines)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(service, relative to haul airlines)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(service, relative to long haul airlines)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(service, relative to other long haul airlines)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(service, relative to major haul airlines)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(service, relative to other major long haul airlines)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, relative to other haul airlines)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(service, relative to other major haul airlines)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(service, relative to haul airlines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(service, relative to major haul airlines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(service, relative to other major haul airlines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(service, relative to haul airlines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, relative to other major long haul airlines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(service, relative to long haul airlines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(service, relative to other haul airlines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(service, relative to other long haul airlines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(service, relative to major long haul airlines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(service, relative to major long haul airlines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(service, relative to major long haul airlines)