setting: be in story

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.58
, detail
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings set
Weight: 0.70
, contrast
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.62
, classroom
Weight: 0.61
, garden
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in story 1.00
be important in story 0.96
be important to story 0.96
be to complication climax of story 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(setting, be in story)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in story)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in story)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(setting, be in story)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(setting, be in story)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(setting, be important to story)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(setting, be important in story)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(setting, be to complication climax of story)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(setting, be important in story)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(setting, be important to story)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(setting, be important in story)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(setting, be important to story)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(setting, be to complication climax of story)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(setting, be to complication climax of story)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(setting, be important in story)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(setting, be important to story)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(setting, be to complication climax of story)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(setting, be in story)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(setting, be in story)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in story)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(setting, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in story)