settlement: were isolated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings agreement
Weight: 0.63
, village
Weight: 0.59
, colony
Weight: 0.53
, ariel
Weight: 0.52
, resolution
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were isolated 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(settlement, were isolated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(village, were isolated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(settlement, were isolated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(village, were isolated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(village, were isolated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(settlement, were isolated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(settlement, were isolated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(settlement, were isolated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(settlement, were isolated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(settlement, were isolated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(settlement, were isolated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(settlement, were isolated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(settlement, were isolated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(village, were isolated)