seven: was little monsters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.49
, number
Weight: 0.46
, journal
Weight: 0.44
, movie
Weight: 0.44
, thing
Weight: 0.43
Siblings five
Weight: 0.34
, three
Weight: 0.33
, nine
Weight: 0.33
, eight
Weight: 0.32
, four
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was little monsters cancelled 1.00
was little monsters 1.00
was monsters cancelled 0.96
was monsters 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(seven, was little monsters)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(seven, was little monsters cancelled)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(seven, was monsters cancelled)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(seven, was monsters cancelled)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(seven, was monsters cancelled)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(seven, was little monsters cancelled)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seven, was little monsters cancelled)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(seven, was monsters cancelled)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(seven, was little monsters cancelled)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(seven, was monsters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(seven, was monsters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(seven, was monsters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(seven, was monsters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(seven, was little monsters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(seven, was little monsters)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(seven, was little monsters)