sex: be on tv harmful to children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.68
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, taboo
Weight: 0.64
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
Siblings sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.72
, escort service
Weight: 0.55
, indecent exposure
Weight: 0.54
, blowjob
Weight: 0.52
, transgender
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on tv harmful to children 1.00
be on tv problem 0.81
be protrayed frequently in tv 0.78
be bad to parents 0.78
be hidden from children 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sex, be on tv harmful to children)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sex, be protrayed frequently in tv)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sex, be protrayed frequently in tv)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sex, be protrayed frequently in tv)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sex, be on tv problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sex, be on tv problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sex, be protrayed frequently in tv)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sex, be on tv problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sex, be on tv problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sex, be bad to parents)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sex, be bad to parents)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sex, be bad to parents)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(sex, be bad to parents)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(sex, be on tv harmful to children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sex, be on tv harmful to children)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sex, be on tv harmful to children)