sexual activity: eating food

Related concepts

Parents	activity Weight: 0.80 , behavior Weight: 0.71 , drug use Weight: 0.66 , action Weight: 0.64
Siblings	sexual intercourse Weight: 0.81 , sexual assault Weight: 0.76 , masturbation Weight: 0.74 , unprotected sex Weight: 0.71 , rape Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property	Similarity
eating food	1.00
be like macaroni salad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(sexual activity, eating food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, be like macaroni salad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(sexual activity, eating food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

Remarkable(masturbation, be like macaroni salad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(masturbation, be like macaroni salad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(sexual activity, eating food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Salient(sexual activity, eating food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.00

Salient(sexual activity, eating food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(sexual activity, eating food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(sexual activity, eating food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(sexual activity, eating food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(sexual activity, eating food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(sexual activity, eating food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(masturbation, be like macaroni salad)