shaman: has quality religion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.58
, seeker
Weight: 0.58
, wise man
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings yogi
Weight: 0.43
, dalai lama
Weight: 0.33
, deity
Weight: 0.33
, priest
Weight: 0.33
, prophet
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality religion 1.00
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(seeker, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shaman, has quality religion)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(seeker, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seeker, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(seeker, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(shaman, has quality religion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(shaman, has quality religion)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(shaman, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(shaman, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(shaman, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shaman, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(shaman, has quality religion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shaman, has quality religion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(seeker, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shaman, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(seeker, has quality good)