shape: be considered spherical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hourglass
Weight: 0.66
, candy cane
Weight: 0.65
, sphere
Weight: 0.64
, spiral
Weight: 0.63
, straight line
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered spherical 1.00
be considered nearly spherical 0.95
is tetrahedral 0.78
appear curved 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(straight line, appear curved)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(straight line, appear curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(straight line, appear curved)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(shape, be considered spherical)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shape, be considered nearly spherical)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(shape, be considered nearly spherical)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shape, be considered nearly spherical)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(shape, be considered nearly spherical)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shape, is tetrahedral)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shape, is tetrahedral)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(shape, is tetrahedral)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(shape, is tetrahedral)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(shape, be considered spherical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(shape, be considered spherical)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(shape, be considered spherical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(straight line, appear curved)