sharing: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.57
, value
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.32
, service station
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, cooperation
Weight: 0.31
, chat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be with motorcycles dangerous 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(option, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sharing, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(option, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(option, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(option, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sharing, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sharing, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(sharing, be with motorcycles dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sharing, be with motorcycles dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sharing, be with motorcycles dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sharing, be with motorcycles dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sharing, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(sharing, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is dangerous)