sheep: live in herds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ruminant
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.65
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.63
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.57
, ewe
Weight: 0.54
, cattle
Weight: 0.38
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.37
, pig
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in herds 1.00
be called sheep 0.81
be reared in sheep stations 0.77
eat more than black sheep 0.77
have lambs 0.77
be better than goats 0.76
have lambs in winter 0.76
have black lambs 0.76
eat less than white sheep 0.76
abandoned lambs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sheep, live in herds)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sheep, have lambs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sheep, have lambs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sheep, abandoned lambs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(sheep, have lambs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(sheep, abandoned lambs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(sheep, have lambs in winter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sheep, abandoned lambs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sheep, have lambs in winter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sheep, abandoned lambs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(sheep, have lambs in winter)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sheep, have lambs in winter)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sheep, have lambs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sheep, live in herds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(sheep, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sheep, live in herds)