shellac: do wonder on old wood

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.63
, resin
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.55
, act
Weight: 0.48
, gum
Weight: 0.44
Siblings varnish
Weight: 0.35
, vinyl
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.35
, linoleum
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
do wonder on old wood 1.00
be at wood 0.82
be used to protect wood 0.79
be at old home 0.77
be same as pretend 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(resin, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(act, be same as pretend)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(resin, be used to protect wood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shellac, do wonder on old wood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(resin, be used to protect wood)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(resin, be at wood)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(act, be same as pretend)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(resin, be at wood)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(resin, be used to protect wood)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(act, be same as pretend)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(linoleum, be at old home)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(resin, be at wood)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(resin, be used to protect wood)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(act, be same as pretend)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(linoleum, be at old home)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(linoleum, be at old home)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(shellac, do wonder on old wood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shellac, do wonder on old wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(act, be same as pretend)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resin, be at wood)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(resin, be used to protect wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(linoleum, be at old home)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(act, be same as pretend)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resin, be at wood)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shellac, do wonder on old wood)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(resin, be used to protect wood)