shellfish: be considered unclean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.64
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.71
, shrimp
Weight: 0.70
, crab
Weight: 0.67
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.64
, clam
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered unclean 1.00
is unclean 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be considered unclean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(shrimp, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be considered unclean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(shellfish, be considered unclean)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is unclean)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(shellfish, is unclean)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(shellfish, is unclean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(shellfish, is unclean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be considered unclean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(shellfish, be considered unclean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be considered unclean)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(shrimp, be considered unclean)