shellfish: has quality sin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.64
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.71
, shrimp
Weight: 0.70
, crab
Weight: 0.67
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.64
, clam
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality sin 1.00
has state abomination 0.76
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality sin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(shellfish, has quality sin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(shellfish, has quality sin)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(shellfish, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has state abomination)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(shellfish, has state abomination)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has quality sin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality sin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)