shelter: affect selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.61
, necessity
Weight: 0.59
, protection
Weight: 0.59
, need
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shed
Weight: 0.57
, belvedere
Weight: 0.36
, sanctuary
Weight: 0.34
, kennel
Weight: 0.33
, hostel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect selection 1.00
affect natural selection 0.93
affect selection for cats 0.88
affect natural selection for cats 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(shelter, affect selection)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(shelter, affect selection for cats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(shelter, affect selection for cats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(shelter, affect natural selection for cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(shelter, affect selection for cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(shelter, affect natural selection for cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(shelter, affect natural selection)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(shelter, affect natural selection for cats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shelter, affect natural selection)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(shelter, affect selection for cats)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(shelter, affect natural selection for cats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(shelter, affect natural selection)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(shelter, affect natural selection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(shelter, affect selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(shelter, affect selection)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(shelter, affect selection)