sheriff: was in south el monte calif

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents county
Weight: 0.73
, police officer
Weight: 0.68
, office
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings state police
Weight: 0.37
, county court
Weight: 0.37
, police
Weight: 0.37
, police car
Weight: 0.36
, police dog
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in south el monte calif 1.00
was in el monte calif 0.99
was in south el monte calif yesterday 0.99
was in el monte calif yesterday 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sheriff, was in el monte calif)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sheriff, was in el monte calif)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sheriff, was in south el monte calif yesterday)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(sheriff, was in south el monte calif yesterday)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sheriff, was in el monte calif yesterday)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sheriff, was in el monte calif)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sheriff, was in el monte calif yesterday)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sheriff, was in south el monte calif yesterday)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sheriff, was in el monte calif yesterday)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sheriff, was in south el monte calif yesterday)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sheriff, was in el monte calif)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sheriff, was in el monte calif yesterday)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sheriff, was in south el monte calif)