shingle: do get them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.54
, damage
Weight: 0.54
, condition
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.50
Siblings tile
Weight: 0.30
, surfboard
Weight: 0.30
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.30
, roof
Weight: 0.30
, flat tire
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
do get them 1.00
do keep getting 0.88
come 0.78
keep coming back 0.78
stay on one side 0.75
happen 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(problem, come)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shingle, do get them)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(problem, come)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(problem, come)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(problem, come)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(shingle, do get them)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(shingle, do get them)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(shingle, come)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(shingle, do keep getting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shingle, come)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(shingle, do keep getting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(shingle, do keep getting)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shingle, do get them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shingle, do get them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(problem, come)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(shingle, do get them)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(problem, come)