shingle: reoccur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.54
, damage
Weight: 0.54
, condition
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.50
Siblings tile
Weight: 0.30
, surfboard
Weight: 0.30
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.30
, roof
Weight: 0.30
, flat tire
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
reoccur 1.00
reoccur in same area 0.95
occur 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(problem, occur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(shingle, reoccur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(problem, occur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(problem, occur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(problem, occur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(shingle, reoccur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(shingle, reoccur)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(shingle, occur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shingle, reoccur in same area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(shingle, reoccur in same area)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shingle, reoccur in same area)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(shingle, occur)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(shingle, reoccur in same area)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(shingle, occur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shingle, occur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shingle, reoccur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(shingle, reoccur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(problem, occur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(shingle, reoccur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(problem, occur)