shoe: be at table

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, piece
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings oxford
Weight: 0.64
, sneaker
Weight: 0.62
, clog
Weight: 0.59
, heel
Weight: 0.56
, puma
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at table 1.00
be at your table 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(toy, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(shoe, be at table)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(object, be at your table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(shoe, be at table)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(toy, be at table)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(object, be at your table)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(toy, be at table)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(object, be at your table)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(toy, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(shoe, be at table)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(object, be at your table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(shoe, be at table)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(shoe, be at table)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at table)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(shoe, be at table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(toy, be at table)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(object, be at your table)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(toy, be at table)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(shoe, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(object, be at your table)