shoe: be most useful in pair

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, piece
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings oxford
Weight: 0.64
, sneaker
Weight: 0.62
, clog
Weight: 0.59
, heel
Weight: 0.56
, puma
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be most useful in pair 1.00
come in pair 0.83
be beautiful as well as useful 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shoe, be most useful in pair)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(object, be beautiful as well as useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(shoe, be most useful in pair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(shoe, be most useful in pair)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(shoe, come in pair)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(shoe, come in pair)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(shoe, come in pair)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(shoe, come in pair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be most useful in pair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shoe, be most useful in pair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(object, be beautiful as well as useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(shoe, be most useful in pair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(object, be beautiful as well as useful)