shoe: come two to set

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, piece
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings oxford
Weight: 0.64
, sneaker
Weight: 0.62
, clog
Weight: 0.59
, heel
Weight: 0.56
, puma
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
come two to set 1.00
come in pair 0.87
come from whole 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(piece, come from whole)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(shoe, come two to set)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(piece, come from whole)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(piece, come from whole)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(piece, come from whole)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shoe, come two to set)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(shoe, come two to set)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(shoe, come in pair)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(shoe, come in pair)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(shoe, come in pair)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(shoe, come in pair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shoe, come two to set)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(shoe, come two to set)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(piece, come from whole)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(shoe, come two to set)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(piece, come from whole)