shopper: has state stop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents department store
Weight: 0.51
, traveler
Weight: 0.48
, issue
Weight: 0.46
, visitor
Weight: 0.45
, user
Weight: 0.44
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.35
, hardware store
Weight: 0.33
, drugstore
Weight: 0.31
, home depot
Weight: 0.30
, computer user
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state stop 1.00
has state problem 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(shopper, has state stop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(shopper, has state stop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(shopper, has state stop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(shopper, has state stop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(shopper, has state stop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(shopper, has state stop)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)