shopping: be in hawaii

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shop
Weight: 0.67
, attraction
Weight: 0.65
, need
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gift shop
Weight: 0.69
, clothing store
Weight: 0.37
, hardware store
Weight: 0.35
, shoe store
Weight: 0.35
, food store
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hawaii 1.00
dallas tx 0.77
be in spain 0.77
be in spain closed on sunday 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shop, be in spain closed on sunday) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(shopping, be in hawaii)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shop, be in spain closed on sunday)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shop, be in spain closed on sunday)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shop, be in spain closed on sunday) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shopping, be in hawaii)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(shopping, be in hawaii)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be in hawaii)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(shopping, be in hawaii)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(shop, be in spain closed on sunday)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(shopping, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(shop, be in spain closed on sunday)