shopping: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shop
Weight: 0.67
, attraction
Weight: 0.65
, need
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gift shop
Weight: 0.69
, clothing store
Weight: 0.37
, hardware store
Weight: 0.35
, shoe store
Weight: 0.35
, food store
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
be for speed hard 0.84
is difficult 0.82
have difficult 0.81
work in harder challenge mode 0.78
is frustrating 0.76
be for speed payback hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shop, work in harder challenge mode)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shopping, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(shop, work in harder challenge mode)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(shop, work in harder challenge mode)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shop, work in harder challenge mode)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(shopping, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(shopping, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(shopping, is difficult)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(shopping, have difficult)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(shopping, is difficult)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(shopping, is frustrating)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(shopping, have difficult)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shopping, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shopping, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(shop, work in harder challenge mode)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shopping, is hard)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(shop, work in harder challenge mode)