short: be at soccer game

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings long hair
Weight: 0.32
, good book
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.31
, time travel
Weight: 0.31
, bad food
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at soccer game 1.00
be at hockey game 0.90
be defined as actor in game of football 0.82
play 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(player, play)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(short, be at soccer game)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(player, be defined as actor in game of football)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(short, be at soccer game)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(player, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(short, be at soccer game)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(player, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(short, be at soccer game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(player, be at soccer game)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(player, be at hockey game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(player, be defined as actor in game of football)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(player, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(player, be at soccer game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(player, be at hockey game)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(player, be defined as actor in game of football)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(player, play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(player, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(player, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(player, be defined as actor in game of football)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(player, play)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(short, be at soccer game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(short, be at soccer game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(short, be at soccer game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(player, be at soccer game)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(player, be at hockey game)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(player, play)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(player, be defined as actor in game of football)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(player, be at soccer game)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(player, be at hockey game)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(player, be defined as actor in game of football)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(short, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(player, play)